251 W. 72nd St. 2F New York, NY 10023 P:(212) 362-2985 F:(212) 362-2986
Prenatal Yoga Center

Elective Surgery: Nose Job. Breast Augmentation. Cesarean????

March 17th, 2008

True story: I had the misfortune of bad timing the other day in the bathroom at the UWS Loews Theater, overhearing a brief conversation between two very pregnant women. The conversation went something like this:

“When are you due?”
“March 20th, but I’m having my c-section on the 18th.”
“I’m having a c-section on the 23rd. Why are you having a c-section?”
“Well, at 37 weeks, the baby was already 7 pounds 13 ounces and my doctor said ‘I wouldn’t put you through labor with a baby that big’.”

I left after that. Shocked by what I heard, I headed back to the theater and proclaimed to my husband, “I know what my next blog entry will be about.”

Sometimes I get the sense that my students feel I am anti-medical establishment. Actually, I am not. I am very thankful that modern medicine and technology exist for true emergencies and for the prevention of disease and illness. (Pregnancy and labor do not often, thankfully, fall into the latter category.) I am, however, not a fan of doctors offering to give elective cesareans for cases of presumed large babies and other erroneous reasons.

I have three major problems with this.

How big is baby really? Many doctors rely on the ultrasound data to determine the weight of the baby. Yet, in a study at the Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, University of Medical Science of Bari, Bari, Italy, it was determined “Twenty-nine formulas provided an overall mean absolute percentage error less than or equal to 10%, with overall predictions within ±10% and ±15% of the actual birth weight (69.2% and 86.5%, respectively). So how could the doctor be so sure that the mother was carrying a 7 pound 13 ounce child?

Big babies do not automatically require a cesarean. Even if a child’s weight is on the higher side, who says that the mother’s body is not capable of birthing her own child? (I personally witnessed a petite mother push out a 10 pound 3 ounce baby, totally naturally!)

I also think that the risks of cesarean births tend to be overlooked. Yes, they are safer than in years past, but there are still many complications and risks to consider when deciding to birth in this manner. The Maternity Center Association released data from a study concluding “Review of more than 300 research studies shows cesarean section increases chances of infection, pain, re-hospitalization, and breastfeeding problems in the mother, and increases the likelihood of serious problems for mothers and babies in future pregnancies, including infertility, placenta problems and fetal death.”

In a very interesting study reported by Science Daily, published by the British Medical Journal, researchers found “Women having a non-emergency caesarean birth have double the risk of illness or even death compared to a vaginal birth”. The article makes a clear distinction between cesareans performed as a result of medical necessity and those which are elected based on other criteria. The neonatal death statistics were also alarming: “The authors also found that the risk of neonatal death was also significantly increased (more than 70% higher) up to hospital discharge for babies who were born head first from both an elective and a clinician chosen caesarean delivery, compared to a vaginal delivery.

So why are doctors performing so many cesareans? There are many factors I’m sure, but the threat of litigation is one of them. Joel M. Evans, MD, OB/GYN, assistant clinical professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Bronx, N.Y., says, “Unfortunately, we’re in an environment in which more cesarean sections are performed than are necessary. One of the reasons for this is the practice of defensive medicine. Doctors are making decisions to perform cesarean sections sooner than they did in the past to avoid lawsuits. What I mean by this is that some cesareans are clear medical necessities, but others lie in a gray area, where there are other possible medically appropriate options. Now, more and more physicians find it easier to follow the growing trend of just go ahead and do it, avoid a lawsuit.”

Also along these same lines, another unfortunate effect of undergoing a cesarean birth is that it forever categorizes the woman as ‘had cesarean’. Should she choose to have another child, she will have to seek out a doctor who specifically supports VBACs (Vaginal Births After Cesarean). Many doctors will not, for fear of a law suit in the event of something going wrong.

Let me be clear: How one births is a personal choice. Furthermore, I am not anti-cesarean, and I am certainly not anti-medicine. I just want to bring to the attention of those women having elective cesareans the fact that there are a number of considerations to be made. The choice is yours, but so is the responsibility to carefully weigh both the risks and the benefits of your decision.

Entry Filed under: Elective Surgery: Nose Job. Breast Augmentation. Cesare

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Heather  |  March 19th, 2008 at 7:07 pm

    I just found your website tonight, and have really been enjoying your blog entries. (I’m looking for prenatal yoga classes in NYC. So delighted to discover you’re just a few blocks away on the UWS!) I look forward to attending classes at your studio, hopefully as soon as this weekend.

  • 2. When is YOUR Cesarean Sch&hellip  |  March 22nd, 2008 at 10:56 am

    [...] Read more.  [...]

  • 3. Tanya  |  March 27th, 2008 at 1:30 pm

    I enjoyed reading your blog on this topic. I teach Prenatal Yoga in Naples Florida and since moving here last year from New Zealand, I have been completely taken aback by the number of elective cesarians! In New Zealand hospitals have a rating system based on their percentage of interventions and cesarians. If they have a high percentage of cesarians it is known to be less safe and many women will elect to travel farther away to a hospital with a lower percentage. I think another reason for the huge numbers of elective Cesarians here is that the insurance companies pay much more for surgery! Keep up your wonderful work!!!

  • 4. Rebecca  |  April 1st, 2008 at 10:20 am

    I too am dismayed by the doctors decision, based on the scan data. I was told at 37 weeks by the sonographer that my baby was 71/2 lbs and would be over 8lbs at birth. He was 6 lbs 13oz at birth. Secondly, i have a friend who delivered an almost 12lb baby (i am not kidding!) vaginally and without drugs. Thank goodness we have the medical technology available when we really need it, but how sad that it would be recommended so flippantly.

  • 5. Jennifer  |  April 10th, 2008 at 6:17 am

    This is really interesting, I wish I would have been more knowledgeble on the subject before opting for a c-section. I was going to have a normal labor until I pushed for 1 hr and a half and thought the pain was too much to bare and in the spur of the moment yelled I wanted a c-section. I didnt know a VBAC had any risks. What kind of risk? If’ I’d known that perhaps I would have tried to push a little longer. But I really felt weak, hadnt eaten anything for 12 hrs!

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

January 2009
S M T W T F S
« Dec    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Recent Posts


Privacy Statement