<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Women Making Bigger Babies?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prenatalyogacenter.com/blog/are-women-making-bigger-babies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prenatalyogacenter.com/blog/are-women-making-bigger-babies/</link>
	<description>A New York City mom sharing her knowledge as a childbirth educator, labor support doula, and her own journey through motherhood</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 02:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Valarie</title>
		<link>http://prenatalyogacenter.com/blog/are-women-making-bigger-babies/#comment-2414</link>
		<dc:creator>Valarie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prenatalyogacenter.com/blog/?p=949#comment-2414</guid>
		<description>Deb,
I was mistaken.  The article in the WSJ that I remembered reading and spoke about in class today actually reported the same results that you found.  I don't know why I remembered it being the opposite.  I apologize.  Anyway, here is the link to the article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704423204575017471267586344.html
Valarie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deb,<br />
I was mistaken.  The article in the WSJ that I remembered reading and spoke about in class today actually reported the same results that you found.  I don&#8217;t know why I remembered it being the opposite.  I apologize.  Anyway, here is the link to the article: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704423204575017471267586344.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704423204575017471267586344.html</a><br />
Valarie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

